As someone deeply immersed in the world of breakbulk, project logistics, and renewable energy, I find President-elect Donald Trump’s proposal to ban new wind turbine projects not only troubling but also fundamentally short-sighted. This isn’t just about politics or energy policy—it’s about the ripple effects such a decision could have on industries that drive global trade and innovation.
Wind energy isn’t just a growing part of America’s energy mix; it’s an economic engine. It powers homes, businesses, and entire regions while supporting nearly 126,000 jobs and attracting billions in investments annually. For the breakbulk and project cargo industries, wind energy has become a lifeline. Moving massive turbine blades, towering nacelles, and heavy foundations requires specialized logistics expertise. Every wind project represents jobs, contracts, and a bustling supply chain.
When Trump dismisses wind energy as an “expensive” and “subsidy-reliant” venture, he misses the bigger picture. Sure, subsidies have played a role in fostering renewables, just as they have for oil and gas for decades. But it’s not just about government support. This is about creating a resilient, diversified energy grid that supports long-term economic and environmental goals.
The Breakbulk Industry’s Dependence on Wind Projects
In the logistics sector, particularly for those of us in breakbulk and project cargo, wind turbines are more than just renewable energy symbols. They’re colossal pieces of engineering that require planning, innovation, and expertise to transport. These components are the bread and butter of many logistics firms. Whether it’s finding a way to ship a 75-meter blade down a winding highway or organizing port operations for offshore wind farms, this work is where logistics meets artistry.
If Trump’s ban materializes, we’re not just talking about losing a few projects here and there. We’re talking about shutting off a major artery of global commerce. Ports that have invested heavily in infrastructure for wind energy shipments could see their investments stranded. Trucking companies and crane operators will lose revenue streams. Specialized vessels, designed and built to carry wind components, might sit idle.
A Blow to Innovation and Progress
What’s most frustrating is that this policy flies in the face of progress. Offshore and onshore wind energy projects represent the future of power generation. Countries like the UK and Germany are demonstrating how renewable energy can transform economies. In the UK, cities like Hull have thrived on the back of offshore wind projects. I’d wager that if Trump took up Humber Marine and Renewables’ invitation to visit Hull, he’d see firsthand how renewables are revitalizing communities.
For those of us who deal with project cargo globally, these developments aren’t just inspiring—they’re essential. The international movement of wind components has spurred innovations in logistics, from designing new transport equipment to developing more efficient shipping routes. Why would we want to walk away from that kind of progress?
The Global Implications of U.S. Policy
Let’s not forget that the U.S. doesn’t operate in isolation. A ban on wind turbines here will ripple across the globe. Manufacturers in Europe and Asia, who rely on U.S. contracts, will feel the pinch. Shipping lanes could see disruptions as fewer turbines are moved between continents. And for breakbulk operators with a global footprint, this could mean a significant hit to revenue.
Furthermore, Trump’s push for oil and gas at the expense of wind energy sends the wrong signal to the world. It’s not about whether fossil fuels are “bad”—it’s about balance. A diversified energy strategy isn’t just good for the planet; it’s good for business.
A Call for Practicality Over Politics
Here’s my take: energy policy shouldn’t be about politics—it should be about practicality. The world is moving toward renewables, whether we like it or not. Ignoring that fact won’t make it go away. Instead of halting wind energy projects, we should be doubling down on innovation, making wind energy more efficient, more cost-effective, and more integrated into our logistics networks.
Trump’s proposal isn’t just a blow to wind energy; it’s a blow to industries like breakbulk and project logistics that rely on these developments. It’s a move that threatens jobs, stifles innovation, and ignores the potential of an industry that has already proven its worth.
As someone who has spent a career navigating the complexities of global logistics, I urge policymakers to think carefully before pulling the plug on wind energy. This isn’t just about turbines; it’s about the countless industries, communities, and families that depend on their continued growth.
Let’s keep moving forward—not backward.
Petrus (Peter) Bouwhuis is a distinguished professional with 44 years of experience in the “industry and project logistics” sector. Currently, he serves as the President & CEO of the XELLZ Group of companies, where he oversees strategic and operational excellence. In addition to this leadership role, he contributes his expertise as a non-executive director at Project Freight Net B.V. (PFN) and iBrabble B.V., a consultancy firm.
