London Tribunal Keeps DP World–Djibouti Dispute Alive

Credit: DP World

Seizure Ruled Illegal

The fight over the Doraleh Container Terminal just hit another milestone. On September 29, the London Court of International Arbitration ruled that Djibouti’s 2018 takeover of the port was illegal. DP World’s 50-year concession deal? Still valid.

But here’s the twist. The court didn’t order damages against Port de Djibouti SA (PDSA). Instead, it put the blame squarely on the government. For DP World, that means the $685 million in earlier awards is still unpaid.

Djibouti’s Spin

Djibouti’s leaders were quick to claim victory. Their headline: DP World’s case was “entirely dismissed.” Sounds convincing, right? Except it’s not the full story.

What the court dismissed were claims only against PDSA. The bigger claims—nearly $1 billion against the government and China Merchants Port Holdings—are still very much alive.

It’s like celebrating a win when the match isn’t even over.

DP World Responds

DP World pushed back, reminding everyone that multiple courts have already said the seizure was illegal. This ruling didn’t change that.

One company spokesperson summed it up: Djibouti can’t just rip up contracts it signed and expect investors to shrug it off.

What’s Really at Stake

At the heart of this? Money and control.

  • DP World wants compensation for lost revenues since 2018
  • Djibouti hasn’t paid a cent of the $685 million already awarded
  • Another $1 billion in claims is still pending

It’s like sending a bill that never gets paid—and watching the total climb higher.

A Warning to Investors

Industry experts say this fight is sending a chilling message. If a government can ignore contracts and international rulings, what does that mean for anyone thinking of investing in ports or infrastructure there?

For now, Djibouti still runs Doraleh. DP World still waits for its money. And the world is watching what happens next.

Disclaimer: “Breakbulk News & Media BV (Breakbulk.News) assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of articles published. The information and or article contained in these articles is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness…

×