Image: for illustration only
Union Pacific Railroad (UP) has announced that it will be raising its fees for low-volume customers who exceed their contractual peak season allotment on outbound lanes from California. This change comes amidst a national uptick in import volumes, with the US West Coast seeing a rare but notable growth, driving UP to adjust its rate structure.
The adjusted Rates will specifically affect shippers who do not move enough cargo per week to qualify for a shipper-specific contract. This means that smaller customers, who often rely on spot rates or operate on an as-needed basis, will feel the impact the most. Shippers with established contracts, however, will remain unaffected by this change. This strategic decision by UP aims to manage capacity more efficiently, especially as import volumes rise, and ensure that the rail network prioritizes its largest and most consistent clients.
What’s driving this decision? It’s the surge in both domestic and international intermodal shipments. This growth tell a clear story: in the first eight months of 2024, domestic intermodal shipments increased while international intermodal shipments saw an even more substantial rise. Highlighting an unusually strong demand, especially in an industry that has faced its share of volatility in recent times.
The West Coast has seen renewed activity, partially due to the easing of labor tensions at the ports and a surge in consumer demand. Importers are once again favoring this route, contributing to the rising volumes, which, in turn, has put pressure on rail operators to adapt. UP’s move seems to be a reflection of the need to manage this surge in traffic while maintaining service quality for its high-volume customers.
For many low-volume shippers, this increase in fees could be a significant financial hit, especially during peak season when every penny counts. It’s an indication that rail operators are increasingly focusing on rewarding loyalty and volume, rather than accommodating one-off or sporadic shipments. This shift may compel smaller shippers to reconsider their logistics strategies, possibly encouraging them to consolidate shipments or seek alternative transportation options.
In the bigger picture, UP’s decision underscores a broader trend in the freight and logistics industry, where supply chain disruptions and shifts in consumer demand patterns have forced companies to rethink their strategies. As rail networks adapt to fluctuating demands, the emphasis appears to be shifting towards securing longer-term, high-volume partnerships.
