The British International Trade Association (BIFA) has voiced its concerns and reactions following the recent release of the revised Border Target Operating Model (BTOM). This model outlines new measures aimed at bolstering the UK’s security, biosecurity, and overall trade system for goods. The association’s comments shed light on the potential challenges and adjustments that its members, who are deeply involved in maritime, breakbulk, project cargo, and logistics operations, might face in the coming months.
According to Steve Parker, the Director General of BIFA, the changes proposed by the BTOM signal a dynamic beginning to the upcoming year for the association’s members. One of the significant transitions involves the shift of export declarations from CHIEF to CDS, a process already in motion for a 30 March 2024 completion. Additionally, Parker emphasized the need for readiness as the implementation of sanitary and phytosanitary controls, along with complete customs controls for non-qualifying Northern Ireland goods, gets postponed to January 2024. Furthermore, medium risk animal products, plants, and high-risk non-animal origin food and feed from the EU will undergo checks from April 2024.
Despite these alterations, concerns loom over the timeline. Parker acknowledges the incremental delays in the implementation timetable and the investments made by BIFA members to align with the shifting deadlines. The trade association remains vigilant about government announcements and their implications.
The BTOM, however, fails to address key concerns raised by BIFA regarding the adequacy of using the present Port Health Authorities for international trade operations. While certain aspects of the updated BTOM display improvement compared to its predecessor, references to the Single Trade Window (STW) raise questions as it remains in developmental stages. The symbiotic relationship between the BTOM and the STW underscores the necessity of the latter’s successful implementation before the former can be effective. Potential delays in large-scale IT projects introduce uncertainties about the proposed timetable.
Moreover, lingering uncertainties persist. The document highlights that some elements of the BTOM are yet to be finalized and could be subject to changes. For instance, the provision of Inland Border Control facilities in Kent for goods entering the UK via the Short Straits is currently under review. This ambiguity complicates decision-making processes for traders dealing with SPS goods, obstructing route planning and compliance with regulatory standards.
As BIFA examines the document in-depth to assess its implications on freight forwarding and logistics operations, the association underscores the importance of addressing these concerns to ensure a seamless transition into the new operating model.
